Main

Talk

Starships

All units

Units

Mando

Other

Leaders

Navies

Media

Gallery

Projects

FB-88[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" FB-88 has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 17:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Faie[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Faie has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 09:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Music for Obi-Wan Kenobi Part 1 and Part 2[]

I need your help. We need the soundtracks for Obi-Wan Kenobi Part 1 and Part 2. Please? Thanks.

Unidentified Jedi Younglings and Local Mos Eisley Boy[]

Hey, it is okay if you created pages for the unidentified Jedi Younglings and Local Mos Eisley Boy in the Obi-Wan Kenobi tv series? (Hobbiton777 (talk) 23:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC))

Workbench 4 page[]

Just FYI, on your Workbench 4 page there's a doubled "archivedate" in the first {{cite_web}} call in the "Warrior culture" section. It appears that the second call to that variable should be removed (it looks like it's a doubled version of the "accessdate". -- Sulfur (talk) 12:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Iskat[]

You have links to "unidentified red-skinned Inquisitor" on your userpage and sixth workbench that need to be updated to Iskat. SilverSunbird (talk) 00:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Clone unit query[]

Sent you a DM on Discord with a picture. Hoping you can take a look and let me know. Thanks. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 06:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Interdictors[]

Hey Vitus! I just want to check with you about the recent merge of Imperial Interdictor with Interdictor (Interdictor-class Star Destroyer) and whether that's been done correctly, seeing that you were involved in the discussion here and that you obviously know far more about Imperial capital ships than I do :P OOM 224 15:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Interdictors[]

I noticed you left a message on OOM's talk page regarding the merge I performed over the Interdictor and the Imperial Interdictor. I believe that Ultimate Star Wars, New Edition clears up the matter quite nicely. "The Imperial Interdictor was an experiment vessel... The rebels' allies mount a rescue mission and manage to destroy the Interdictor. The prototype leads to a line of Star Destroyers named the Interdictor-class with the same specificationsa and capabilities." This in my mind proves that the Interdictor and the Imperial Interdictor and one and the same. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk)

Interdictor-class[]

Hi, I have noticed that the Interdictor-class article makes no mention of the Imperial Navy in body despite it being listed in the infobox. If you could rectify this issue, that would be much appreciated. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

• Fixed, thank you --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Hello again, I added a bit to establish the Navy properly in the body. Another point, me and a few other ACs recently reviewed the update from Hidden Empire and have agreed that there is simply too much context not directly relevant to the article. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
    • I trimmed it down, let me know if it needs further trimming. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Whirlwind[]

Hey Vitus. On your workbench here, it incorrectly lists the Whirlwind as a Chiss heavy cruiser. Nothing in the source ID's it as a heavy cruiser. Just wanted to let you know, I can fix it myself if you want, didn't want to intrude lol BloodOfIrizi (talk) 00:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Canon ship navboxes[]

Hi Vitus. Just wondering what sources have been used for the classifications of canon ship navboxes, such as the Star Destroyer navbox and MC-series navbox. Obviously Star Wars is never really consistent. Thanks. Loqiical (talk) 04:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Onager[]

Hey Vitus, I noticed that this card doesn't appear to be documented in Onager-class Star Destroyer. Also worth mentioning are the two cards depicting the different weapons. Thankfully, it's just a miniscule update. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

• Hey! If I'm not mistaken isn't the card documented on the fifth bullet point under sources? Can you also confirm the two cards you're referring to? I also see them listed in the sources, both the standard card and the Upgrade Card Collection variants. Thank you! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
  • To clarify, the events depicted in the artwork should be documented in the body. Sorry for the confusion. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Ahh, I gotcha. They've been added, thanks --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Interdictor-class[]

Hi Vitus, unfortunately the Interdictor-class is at 1032 words, over the word limit for a GA. Since it's missing coverage of Hidden Empire in the intro, it's pretty certain that it'll stay above 1000 now. Did some cleaning up of a bit of the new content but I'll leave it to you to decide what to do with the article. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 19:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Wookieepedia SAN Awards 2022[]

NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 13:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Qaz[]

Hiya Vitus, hope you're doing good. I was cleaning up qaz-class Star Destroyer and was hoping to have a look at Ships of the Empire and the Rebellion just to double check what's on there. Do you happen to have a scan you could share? Thanks. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 12:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

• Hey Tommy, nice to see you here. It basically only reconfirms what's already in the article. It says "This type of Star Destroyer has served the Empire since the beginning. Its firepower is equivalent to that of the first attempts to develop a weapon based on Kyber technology, attempts which resulted in the super-lasers of the Death Stars. The Malevolence is one of the only ones to remain active during the time of the Galactic Civil War, the others no longer being used." Hope this helps --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Sorry forgot to reply, but that's perfect Vitus, thank you. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 16:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Unused image[]

Hey Vitus! This image appears unused but it is actually used on a workbench of yours. If you still need it, would you like to keep it as a user image for now? Imperators II^(Talk) 08:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

A pair of CAs[]

Hey Vitus, Republic Security Council is over the word count limit for Comprehensive articles and so should be renominated for Good article status. I see you already tried doing so once - do you have a free nomination slot and are willing to do it soon, or should it have CA status removed for now and you'll get around to GANing when you have the opportunity? And conversely, Honor Guard has less than 165 words in the body and so should have the sectioning removed. Imperators II^(Talk) 13:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Stattata and Pryce[]

Hey Vitus! Regarding this edit, you say 'Stattata could've been replaced by Pryce for all we know. There's nothing to contradict Pryce and Stattata being Moffs at different times', but this can't be the case because the Rebel Files states that Stattata was governor of the Lothal sector at the same time Pryce apparently was (at the time of the Princess on Lothal episode) Lewisr (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

• I see, thanks for clarifying Lewisr. Then yeah it should be reverted back to Moff Stattata and Governor Pryce --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Storm Squadron[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Storm Squadron has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Samonic (Talk) 12:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Warlord Shuffle[]

Hey there! Just wanted to let you know that I've shuffled around the naming of these guys (and also their respective images) in case you want to update your workbenches. Cheers, Imperators II^(Talk) 19:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Timelines[]

Hey Vitus, I just learned that Star Wars: Timelines mentions the Assertor and Bellator so you'll want to investigate that. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks for the head's up! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

CAs[]

Hey Vitus, Honor Guard, one of your CAs, is marked for review due to a word count issue, if you wanna have a look. Republic Security Council is also marked due to going above the word limit. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

• Fourth Fleet only has 128 words in the body, so no sectioning is required. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Exchequer[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Exchequer has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Samonic (Talk) 07:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Scipio blockade[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Scipio blockade has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Samonic (Talk) 16:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Boyse[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Boyse has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Fan26 19:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Starhawk-class Battleship Mark II[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Starhawk-class Battleship Mark II has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 01:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Mon Calamari ships[]

Hi Vitus, I'd like to get your opinion on whether the same characteristics (depicted) should be applied to all members of a class of Mon Calamari ships (for example, length), given that sources say that Mon Calamari ships were all unique. I prefer to assume as little as possible but as a fiction wiki this site has different standards to something like Wikipedia. Thanks. Loqiical (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

• Hey Loqiical, for Mon Calamari ships we shouldn't assume length since they are all unique, although some sources say that the ships are between 1,200 and 1,500 meters if I recall correctly, so that could be used. But if we see for example "Engine Model ABC" in one cruiser, and we see it again in a separate cruiser, I'd say we can fairly assume that they are the same engine model. Just because it's said that they're all different doesn't mean that there aren't similar components. They can be unique in other ways, like internal systems or some physical hull alterations. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
  • This will be a wider cultural discussion but essentially I wonder to what extent we can assume. Maybe a source eventually says that this specific ship didn't have engine model X like the rest. Then would our assumptions be so justified? It also links to how a fiction wiki only describes what is depicted by the media, I suppose, and our articles would look much different if this were Wikipedia. Loqiical (talk) 03:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Praetor II-class ship[]

Hey Vitus, if you have the time, I found a discrepancy in one of CAs, Praetor II-class ship. The Legends info should be restructured a la Bellator-class dreadnought. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Talk page CT change[]

Hey Vitus, just wanted to let you know I made a small tweak to the proposal on Forum:CT:Update to the talk page policy since you had already voted. Supreme Emperor ^Holocomm 01:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Page "inuse" for over a week[]

I was going to edit the Warship article and noticed that it had an inuse tag that's been on there since May 29. Were you still working on that page? Planning to come back to it? Thanks. -- Sulfur (talk) 17:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Bellator-class dreadnought[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Bellator-class dreadnought has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:34, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

SH:Starship class and type[]

Hi there. I've added some thoughts to this senate hall article in case you are still interested in it. Thanks. Loqiical (talk) 01:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Select Committee[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Select Committee has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 19:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Special Forces Command[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Special Forces Command has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 15:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Imperial Army Special Missions trooper[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Imperial Army Special Missions trooper has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 22:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified Mon Calamari cruiser (Sullust system)[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Unidentified Mon Calamari cruiser (Sullust system) has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 16:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified Clone Captain (Tranquility)[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Unidentified Clone Captain (Tranquility) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — lucaror 12:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Adar Tallon[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Adar Tallon has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 04:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Where you heard Fallen Order voice line[]

Hello Vitus! I was wondering if you remember the location in Fallen Order where you heard the voice line about the Unidentified Imperial commander (Zeffo). I checked through the game's Kashyyyk sections and I couldn't find it, though it's likely I just missed it. Thanks in advance! AmazinglyCool (talk) 23:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

• Hey AmazinglyCool, if I remember correctly it was where we first encounter an electrohammer Purge Trooper on Kashyyyk. I don't remember exactly when that is, but electrohammer purge troopers aren't that common so hopefully that helps a bit! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
• It also sounded like a Purge trooper talking, not a scout trooper. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Coalition for Improvements[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Coalition for Improvements has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 17:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Assault (CompForce)[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Assault (CompForce) has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 19:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Observation[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Observation has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Commander Code-8 Hello There! 09:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Imperator-class Star Destroyer[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Imperator-class Star Destroyer has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 02:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Is Bold text allowed in quotes?[]

Hey, I saw you changed the bold text on the quote on Unidentified Imperial officer, and I wondered if bold text is allowed?

On the manual of style it says: "For emphasis, use italics instead of emphasized boldfaced wording. In quote templates, emphasis is achieved by removing italics.", but I do not see why boldfaced wording isnt allowed?Rxxxxxxxxxx (talk) 01:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

• Bold face in an article is used to represent the article's name in the text. Using bold in a quote would go against that. For example in the intro of Tenth Brother, "Tenth Brother" and "Prosset Dibs" are in bold as that is the subject of the article. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 11:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Okay, thanks for letting me know. Are the quotes on the unidentified imperial officer page in correct format then? Rxxxxxxxxxx (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
    • Yep! Looks like it to me --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

CompForce[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" CompForce has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 18:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Darth Wrend[]

Hey Vitus! I hope you're doing well! I was just curious if you ever had any plans to get back into working on Darth Wrend, as I know in the past you had done some nomination stuff with them. If you did have no plans, I was wondering if I'd maybe be able to take over the page and work on bringing it up to status please? I didn't want to take over anything you might have one day had plans with without seeing what your plans were first, so thought I'd drop a message and ask you. Thanks! Lewisr (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

• Hey Lewisr! I don't have any plans with Darth Wrend, anymore, feel free to go ahead! Thanks for asking --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks so much Vitus! And of course, just wanted to make sure first Lewisr (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Republic Security Council[]

Heya Vitus; my apologies on the delay on notifying—was sifting through the former SA bins and wanted to stop by and say that Republic Security Council did get stripped and all because it went over word count. Checked the review and saw you'd intended to send it to GAN, but forgot to send a message when I'd archived it to say it was now good to send. Would love to see you put that one up again sometime! Seems pretty much done. (Brotherhood stuff, always the best). Cheers, —spookywilloww^talk 09:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Assertor-class Star Dreadnought[]

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Assertor-class Star Dreadnought has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{User FA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — masterfredster 08:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Interdictor-class[]

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Interdictor-class has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{User FA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 00:36, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Strok[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Strok has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 16:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Acclamator image[]

For your personal work bench: File:Acclamator.jpg has been marked for deletion, replaced by File:Acclamator-SWCTP.png. Respecting your notice on the top of the page and not replacing it myself. If you are OK with me replacing images going forward, just let me know. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 18:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

GAN objection for Unidentified Imperial officer (Darth Vader's Venator-class Star Destroyer)[]

Hey, just checking in to see if you saw the response I gave to your objection for Unidentified Imperial officer (Darth Vader's Venator-class Star Destroyer). Thanks! Rxxxxxxxxxx (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Sutta[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Sutta has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — anilserifoglu 16:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified Mon Calamari Star Cruiser[]

Hey Vitus! Just wanted to give you a heads up that an objection I left on Unidentified Mon Calamari Star Cruiser is just short of 12 days unaddressed, if you wouldn't mind getting to that when you had a chance please? Thanks! Lewisr (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

• Apologies, I missed it! Addressed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:16, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
  • All good! Thanks for handling it Lewisr (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified Mon Calamari Star Cruiser[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Unidentified Mon Calamari Star Cruiser has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — anilserifoglu 01:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Dawn of Rebellion[]

Hey Vitus! Will list the info here:

• The Guardian is established as being the name of the Venator that Jan Dodonna served as a bridge officer aboard during the Clone Wars.
• The JT-731 Broadhorn transport is the name given to the Jabiim freight transport. The description reads that their holds were rated for transporting garbage and as such were rarely given a second look at by Imperial patrols. It says they were refitted by early rebels as seret refugee ships. There's also an arrow pointing at the top of the ship which mentions externalized data and power conduits to maximise internal cargo space.
• The Imperial Prison Transport (or IPT as noted in the book) is established as foun ferrying prisoners to worlds like Narkina 5. It is stated to be a repurposing of a troop transport (the Imperial transport) with all comforts stripped out and new restraints added. There are several arrows pointing to parts of the ship which mention the prisoner passenger cabin on the right side. Another mentions that life support systems are kept at bare minimum. It's noted that the cockpit is physically separated from the prisoner hold. And an arrow pointing to the something holding the engines saying 'ion sublight drive support strut'.

Hope this helps! Thank you Lewisr (talk) 05:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

• You're welcome! Lewisr (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Immobilizer 418 cruiser[]

Hey Vitus, just as a heads up, you have an addressed objection here on Immobilizer 418 cruiser for a couple weeks, if you wouldn't mind taking a look when you have a chance please. Since you were away on holiday I provided the info to ThrawnChiss from the source which they've added, so you just need to look over the additions to see if you're all good with it Lewisr (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Unidentified Mon Calamari cruiser (Geist)/Walex Cantwell Blissex I[]

Hey Vitus, sorry again to bring more status article stuff to your attention:P

• On Unidentified Mon Calamari cruiser (Geist), there's an objection from Braha approaching a couple weeks, more of a heads up on this in case you weren't aware
• For Walex Cantwell Blissex I there's an objection from me that is 10 days unaddressed as of today regarding some info I found in the new Dawn of Rebellion guide.
• I also want to note that Senatorial arrests is in need of updating per Dawn of Rebellion also. If you need the info from the book do let me know and I can get that to you.

Thank you! Lewisr (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Walex[]

Just stopping by to inform that I've archived Walex Cantwell Blissex I's GAN per request; look forward to seeing it on the FAN, should be rather quick as most of us can carry votes over. There's also a somewhat revival movement going on for bringing former SAs back to status—would, be fun if you had time to tow Republic Security Council back up! Looks done and etc.—spookywilloww^talk 15:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks Spooky! I renominated Republic Security Council and Walex Cantwell Blissex I. :) --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Walex Cantwell Blissex I[]

"So—you've finally made it in the big leagues!" Walex Cantwell Blissex I has been approved by the Inquisitorius and awarded Featured status. Feel free to add the {{User FA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The Inquisitorius thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 01:09, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Supreme Commander of the Alliance Armed Forces[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Supreme Commander of the Alliance Armed Forces has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Lewisr (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Ormeddon[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Ormeddon has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — masterfredster 19:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Sicko[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Sicko has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 16:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

The Council has decided its fate[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Republic Security Council has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 18:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

RE: First Jedi[]

Hiya! Looks like it was just some silliness by a few users. I've unprotected the page now. OOM 224 (he/him) 10:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Mantooine Medallion[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Mantooine Medallion has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 02:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Stub (clone pilot)[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Stub (clone pilot) has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 18:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Endor campaign ribbon[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Battle of Endor campaign ribbon has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 02:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Illudium Star[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Illudium Star has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 20:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Tector[]

Hi Vitus, it's been a while but I hope you're well. Tector-class Star Destroyer is currently under review and in need of name confirmation. I noticed you completed the appearances for Starships of the Empire and the Rebellion and I was wondering if you could tell me what the booklet say about the class and whether its full name is given. Thank you! Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

• Hey Tommy, hope all is well! Currently, the section that references the Tector is called Tector-class and then has the following paragraph, "The lack of a ventral hangar marked the main difference between this class and other Star Destroyers. During the Battle of Endor, one of these ships, the Harbinger, formed part of the Imperial fleet heading to protect the second Death Star from the rebel attack." Sorry, but looks like the full name isn't present here either. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Perfect, thank you for that! Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
• Also, not sure if you've seen it but ISD II ship articles (ex. Overseer (Imperial-class Star Destroyer), Vigilance (Imperial-class Star Destroyer), etc.) are being moved from ISD IIs to just ISDs. I haven't been able to find a discussion on that whatsoever, but I remember there was conversation years ago on duck testing ISDs to ISD IIs. I don't think this is a reasonable decision, whoever made it, and the new article names don't follow naming convention rules either. Bringing it up to see if you know anything about it or if not what your thoughts are. I'm not as active as I used to be so I'm not sure what consensus there has been. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
  • I had. Hmm, personally I don't think there's much of an issue with duck testing them as ISD IIs, although the number of known ISD Is that have been upgraded is slowly rising. I think this is certainly the more cautious approach, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. With an issue like this an SH thread would be the best way to settle this once and for all. Perhaps compile all of the upgraded ISD Is to see how common it was? Though in any case, yes the naming of them is correct I think. Per WP:NP: "The parenthetical descriptor need only specify the abbreviated ship class (example: Relentless (Pellaeon-class)) unless the abbreviated class name applies to multiple ship classes, in which case the full ship class name shall be specified (example: Vanguard (Defender-class light corvette), because "Defender-class" may refer to several different ship classes)." We have the Imperial-class Star Destroyer, the Imperial-class 1-H repulsortank (which, strictly speaking, isn't a ship class, but whatever), and the Allegiance-class battlecruiser was sometimes called an Imperial-class Super Star Destroyer (according to Imperial (disambiguation), at least. The actual ship page doesn't state this *shrug*), therefore the full class is used in the parenthetical descriptor. Likewise, we have both the Imperial II-class Star Destroyer and Imperial II-class frigate, which was my rationale for originally moving some of those very pages. I'll leave it up to you about how to proceed with the classification itself, I'd need to see how many upgraded ISD Is we have to decide how safe we should play it. But for the naming itself, that is following policy correctly, imo. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Star of Alderaan[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Star of Alderaan has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Commander Code-8 Hello There! 20:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

"Class II Star Destroyer"[]

I am working on an expansion for the Imperial II-class Star Destroyer page and noticed that you added that "Starships of the Empire and Rebellion" Id'd it as a "Class II Star Destroyer." I don't have the booklet, but I spoke with Master Fred, and he said that the English edition does not have that information and therefore it could be a mistranslation. Could you confirm that Starships uses the name "Class II Star Destroyer"? ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 03:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

• Hey Vitus, I think this slipped your radar, still wondering about this. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 01:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Hey ThrawnChiss7, yeah sorry about that! I'll look into it --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Whenever you get some time, I would love to know about this still. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 02:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Corellian Cross[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Corellian Cross has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — masterfredster 07:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Workbench categories[]

Heya, Vitus. Briefly noticed while cleaning out Special:WantedCategories that your workbench is sitting in the WookieeProjects category and also in the non-existent categories for Project Defiance and Task Force Resolve. Was curious if you'd be willing to temporarily <!-- comment those out until those projects come to fruition, along with nicking out the Incomplete lists category on there, since those're all more or less meant for main pages. Thanks, —spookywilloww^talk 05:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

ISB Supervisor edit reverted[]

Why was my edit in regards to the ISB Supervisor's rank reverted? Star Wars: Dawn of Rebellion: The Visual Guide includes a detailed guide of the Security division ranks and pictures a single-rowed plaque with three blue tiles as the rank of Captain. Since all Supervisors depicted in Andor Season One wear this plaque, they must also carry the equivalent rank specified in the Canon reference book. No Supervisors have been depicted as wearing two blue tiles, only ISB Attendants.AxMech (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

• Hey AxMech, sorry I should've explained my reasoning. The chart is inconsistent with what is depicted in the series. Dedra Meero, Blevin and others are referred to as lieutenants in the series and other material despite having three blue tiles. The continuity error in the reference book should be noted in the book's article and the rank insignia page. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 11:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Wookieepedia SAN Awards 2023[]

"

Imperators II^(Talk) 19:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Mon Cal FAN[]

Heya, Vitus! In case you missed it, I've left some objections on Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Unidentified Mon Calamari cruiser (Geist). OOM 224 (he/him) 17:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Hey OOM, thanks! I'll get to them today --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Medal SANs[]

Hey Vitus, whenever you get the time, please mention in the BTS that the medals appeared simultaneously in the X-Wing game and The Farlander Papers, as the booklet was included in the game's box. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Alk ol Nojj and Ark ol Noor[]

Hi there, I was looking through Knights of Fate and couldn't find Ark ol Loor and Alk ol Nojj anywhere and the edit history of their articles credits you as the creator. I know that this was years ago but do you by any chance remember where in the sourcebook they are mentioned? Sanathestarr (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

• Hey there! I believe it was in the intro section. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
  • oh I totally missed that, thanks! Sanathestarr (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Pellaeon[]

Hey Vitus, hope you are doing well! Thanks for the heads-up about Pellaeon's rank plaque on Twitter! To document it in BTS, could you please give example(s) of any naval captains wearing that badge? The only one I found so far is Tala Durith and an officer in Fortress Inquisitorius, but I guess Imperial Army affiliation makes sense for those. AnilSerifoglu (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Unidentified droid battalion[]

I moved Unidentified droid battalion to Unidentified droid battalion (Anaxes). I am going to turn the former into a disambiguation page. You may want to edit your user page and User:Vitus Infinitus/Workbench 2 to fix the redirects. Rakhsh (talk) 19:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)