Main

Talk

Moderation

Re-inuse[]

Sorry about that I wasn’t paying attention I have been editing on my breaks at work and missed the inuse template. - Red Duel 18:29, December 2, 2018 (UTC)

Moving articles[]

Hi, Vitus. If you're going to move articles related to Canon/Legends disambiguation, we require that you fix the links in the process, otherwise many, many things become broken. All of the articles that linked to [[Jerec]] for the Legends Inquisitor will now be broken, as will everything that pointed to whatever article you've moved to that new title. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:14, January 13, 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks. For future reference, if there's a big move like this with too many links to manually update, it's best to leave a request on Wookieepedia:Bot requests and someone will (eventually) get it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:19, January 13, 2019 (UTC)

Hey[]

Hey. I was wondering why we are not including Blitz in the list of Canon Advanced Recon Commandos?

-Chillerrr1234 Talk Page 18:52, January 24, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Minister of the Interior[]

Hi Vitus. My interpretation would be that under the current rules you wouldn't be able to make the Minister of the Interior article and should just link to the title when referring to him in articles. As to the precursor species and those other articles, I'd argue that because it's more ambiguous as to whether those are the same thing as their named legends counter parts the articles are probably ok. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:08, January 25, 2019 (UTC)

24th Bombardment Squadron[]

Hi. You hit 24th Bombardment Squadron, which I'd recently revised, with the Cleanup and Citation tags. I've added references to the sources (not hard), and removed the Citation tag. Was there anything else you felt warranted the Cleanup tag? Wookieeperial (talk) 15:08, January 26, 2019 (UTC)

Cite web template[]

Hey Vitus, a reminder that you don't need to add every single field, like the usage instructions mention, you should add only the ones needed like this. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:43, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Canon planets improvement drive[]

Hello, Vitus! I wanted to ask how interested you'd be in a collaborated effort with several other users to improve the quality of many of our canon planet articles, as a large number are in dire need of help. This would include adding images, expanding, updating, reorganizing per the Layout Guide, sourcing, etc., and of course, people are welcome to take articles to status. That's not required, though, as we'd just be looking to make the articles more complete and presentable. Would you be interested? MasterFred^(Whatever) 18:06, February 6, 2019 (UTC)

• No worries! I understand. Here is the project page just in case anything happens to intersect with your GAR work. Happy editing! MasterFred^(Whatever) 00:40, February 7, 2019 (UTC)

FAN[]

Hey, Vitus. Apologies if I offended you with my comments on your Inquisitorius Headquarters nom. While I'm still a little disappointed about your satisfaction of my objections, with your duplicate links and incorrectly sourced info, I think I could've worded it more constructively. I'm also sorry to see your noms are nearing/are in the 2 week deadline for responding to objections. You have worked really hard on these and it'd be a shame to see them fail after all this, and I hope you haven't been put off by my comments. You are a quality editor and you shouldn't feel bad for a slight mistake. We all make them, and I shouldn't have responded like that. I do hope you try again for your articles. Tommy Macaroni 21:09, February 17, 2019 (UTC)

• Hey Tommy, no worries! I wasn't offended by your comments I haven't read them till now and it's understandable. I'm sorry for my lack of addressing objections and fixing them improperly when I do, I have a lot of things going on right now in my life and I'm also very busy outside of the Wook so my FANs aren't a priority right now. I'll try to address all objections as soon as possible to avoid getting them removed. Again, no worries about your response, an apology isn't necessary!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:42, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
  • Okay good, I'm glad to hear that. Tommy Macaroni 16:52, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
    • And yeah don't worry, real life can be a bitch sometimes :P Tommy Macaroni 16:52, February 18, 2019 (UTC)

/* Would like clarifications on using materials */[]

Hi! User Lewisr referred me to you as you might be better able to help me figure something out. I'm a newbie when it comes to editing wiki pages and I'm curious about specifics within the source materials.

For example, the Jedi Temple Guardian info on page 72 in Nexus of Power. It mentions how their armor weaves layers of protective fabrics and how it provides a subtle but effective defense against blaster bolts and lightsabers. To me this sounds like Armorweave, but the term armorweave is not brought up within the info block about them in the book. Would this mean I can't say their robes incorporate Armorweave?

Another thing, it gives the weapon stats of the Temple Guard Lightsaber Pike. Everything about it is akin to the standard double bladed lightsaber except for two things. 1) It has the Defensive property, and 2) it has the Stun property allowing a blade to deal 4 stun damage instead of regular damage. Does this warrant adding in the fact that the Temple Guard lightsaber pike has a stun setting? As for the defensive property, this means it adds 1 more difficulty check against melee attacks, meaning it's good vs melee weapons (like lightsabers). I think this would lean more towards speculation but in the past (Legends) it has been mentioned that the pikes were made of lightsaber resistant materials. Does this bit of info prove that? (I don't think so but I can only hope)

I'm fairly certain the contents within this book are canon as the back has the Disney logo and the book contains info on Lothal and other Canon content along with new information on other planets that contain a Force Nexus of sorts.

What are your thoughts on the matter?

I think the robes incorporating armorweave and the pike being better against melee weapons within the RPG due to lightsaber resistant materials leans more towards speculation. But the book makes it clear that it's able to perform Stun damage. It also mentions how they have the ability "Force Bind" which allows the Temple Guards to immobilize a target within short range. Could this be considered official information as well?

--Ruchalus (talk) 04:28, February 21, 2019 (UTC)Ruchalus

Canon Gar Project[]

Fan26 (Talk) has awarded you a Wookiee Cookie! Seriously, someone needs to congratulate you on this. You've been doing an enormously good job on updating all articles related to the GAR. Keep it up.

• Yeah, you're welcome. Wish you the best with it! Fan26 (Talk) 18:17, February 21, 2019 (UTC)

Tierny archival links[]

Hey Vitus, just to let you know, you forgot to add the archival link to the source on Tierny. Essentially, you just have to copy the link into the wayback machine and then copy the archive date in the url back into the "archivedate=" field in the template.

And sorry if I just caused an edit conflict-I realized that I had ignored the massive edit template when I corrected the link only after I hit publish. Fan26 (Talk) 15:18, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

• Alright, good to know. Fan26 (Talk) 15:33, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

Special forces category[]

Hey Vitus, yes I'd probably say its a good idea, I am somewhat surprised it hadn't been made before. Just looking at Special forces/Legends seems its a good shout --Lewisr (talk) 19:05, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

• It says 'a particularly stubborn Special Force pilot' referring to Unidentified Special Forces TIE pilot, not sure if that helps or anything --Lewisr (talk) 05:31, February 24, 2019 (UTC)
  • Yeah sounds good --Lewisr (talk) 05:35, February 24, 2019 (UTC)

Climate Disruption Arrays[]

Hello Vitus Infinitus, Please do not remove the game in universe section, it is additional information, its been there since four to three weeks, I haven't had anyone complain about it. It was also approved to be added. Thanks, May the Force Be With You! Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 17:13, February 26, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

• Thank you, I wasn't aware of the tweets. Sorry for the confusion I caused. May The Force Be With You! Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 19:08, February 26, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Images[]

Hey Vitus, do I really need to rename those BFII images? Surely if they feature the outdated armour details I can just delete them, because we can't use them in canon articles? Tommy Macaroni 20:57, February 27, 2019 (UTC)

• That was me who tagged them initially, but if they're outdated then deleting them is probably is the better option --Lewisr (talk) 21:00, February 27, 2019 (UTC)
  • Oh sorry I should've checked the history. Yeah that's fine I'll do it now. Tommy Macaroni 21:03, February 27, 2019 (UTC)

Silly, Mistake for Fondor Station[]

My bad! I wasn't aware that the Era(s) were used only for Legends. I thought it was for both. Silly me. Thanks for finding the mistake. May the Force be with you! Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 15:11, March 5, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Collapse of the Republic[]

While I do appreciate all the filling in you did for the appearances. Next time, can you please allow me a little time, as the page creator, to do so myself? I just spend a good amount of time expanding it only to have an edit conflict, and all my work wasted. Thanks. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 03:54, March 9, 2019 (UTC)

• Hey JMAS, I'm really really sorry about that, I didn't check when the article was created because I searched it up and I was unaware that there was an edit in progress. I know how it feels when this sort of situation comes up, and I really didn't intend for this to happen. I'm really sorry, I'll be more attentive from now on.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:59, March 9, 2019 (UTC)
  • No hard feelings. And honestly, you did add a few things I hadn't and I also didn't add the references. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:04, March 9, 2019 (UTC)

Moving pages[]

Hey Vitus, when you move pages (as you just did with Mission to Cyrkon), really you ought to go through and fix all the redirects rather than just leaving it to someone else to do. Just a reminder in case you forgot --Lewisr (talk) 15:18, March 13, 2019 (UTC)

• It's okay no harm done! As I said its more of a reminder if anything because sometimes these things can easily just be forgotten and left untouched for a while --Lewisr (talk) 15:23, March 13, 2019 (UTC)

Grysk Inuse[]

Sorry! I'm currently adding in some things in the Grysk, But I'm currently working on the Grysk Military and the Imperial-Grysk Conflict. Good luck! Anyways, May The Force Be With You, --Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 12:47, March 27, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Wait, Darth Sidious is back?[]

Hey, Infinitus, Whats all this talk about Palps being back? This true??? I haven´t seen the trailer yet, my Wi Fi here at school is horrible right now. --Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 18:36, April 12, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Cere is Seer[]

Hi Vitus Infinitus,

I wanted to write you to see if you can change Cere back to Seer. This StarWars.com article states that Cal Kestis' Jedi mentor is named "Seer" (as the article originally stated) and not "Cere" (https://www.starwars.com/news/swcc-2019-5-things-we-learned-from-the-star-wars-jedi-fallen-order-panel).

Regards----X9 The Android (talk) 13:27, April 14, 2019 (UTC)

Chiss Warrior Page Being Deleted[]

Sorry, I just created it, and well, I don't know exactly what to do. They first appeared in the Outbound Flight novel, when Thrawn took several Chiss warriors on board with them. I could use some help on this... --Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 16:20, May 2, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Bozeden Jeems[]

Why did you undo the edit? It's definitely him playing the role CrimsonChaos99 (talk) 20:06, May 22, 2019 (UTC)

Sources[]

I ran both Bozeden Jeems and Lusica Stynnix through two different facial recognition/comparison sites. Both sites say they are Jamie Beamish and Jenn Murray respectively CrimsonChaos99 (talk) 20:17, May 22, 2019 (UTC)

Rise of the Separatists[]

Based on your edits, it seems you own Rise of the Separatists. Does it give any new details on B1-series battle droids? Thank you.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:11, June 7, 2019 (UTC)

• Hi?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 12:58, June 8, 2019 (UTC)
  • Okay then. Roger, roger I suppose!--Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:40, June 11, 2019 (UTC)

Red Insurgency[]

Hey Vitus, apologies about the Red Insurgency, I only noticed afterwards that you'd added the tag just as I was editing it --Lewisr (talk) 14:50, June 14, 2019 (UTC)

Darth Bane — Rise of the Separatists[]

Hey there, I see that you are doing a great job of filling the Appearances section of Rise of the Separatists, and if you do have the book, I'd like to ask you a favor. I'm trying to keep the canon Darth Bane article up-to-date, and could you tell me what the book says about him, or his Rule of Two? Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:06, June 21, 2019 (UTC)

• Oh, Ayre has just sent me the necessary part from the book, thank you anyways! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:04, June 24, 2019 (UTC)

The Inuse tag[]

Hi, Vitus. You have a tendency to tag a lot of articles with {{Inuse}}. There's nothing wrong with that, as long as you're actually working on those articles. Whenever I go through the inuse category, there's at least one article of yours that is tagged Inuse and hasn't been touched in weeks. Please be mindful of this and review your inuse projects more often, and please use a workbench for long-term projects. Thanks. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:40, June 23, 2019 (UTC)

TX-130[]

Hi, Vitus. With its recent addition to Star Wars Battlefront II, I am preparing to nominate TX-130 Saber-class fighter tank to GA status. I am currently expanding the article with the information from Knights of Fate, and I'd like to ask you something. I can't seem to find the page about the second paragraph of the History, which you have added. Could you help me out? Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:15, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

• Ah, thank you! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:37, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

Republic Intelligence[]

Can you tell me what the Rise of the Separatists says about R.I.? or if so can you email any pictures you have of the book to my email mattboesch@att.net?--Jkirk8907 (talk) 04:01, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

• • Thank You--Jkirk8907 (talk) 04:08, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

Redirects and breaking things[]

Vitus, I've warned you before about upsetting redirects and breaking links in the process. If you're going to create a Canon article over a Legends redirect like you did here, you need to update the existing Legends links, otherwise things get broken. Please go back and update those links, and please don't do this again. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:36, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:08, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

Making pages[]

(Rover paul (talk) 01:55, July 1, 2019 (UTC)) when I start to create a page keep forgetting how to start the edit can you help be appreciated Rover Paul

96th[]

Yo Vitus, I was wondering if you'd mind doing a check of Dawn of Rebellion for me? The book page currently says the Ninety-Sixth Task Force is an Imo, but I just wanted to double check what it said myself before nomination. I don't know if you still have access to the book, but if you do I'd really appreciate you taking a look for me. Cheers, Tommy Macaroni 20:19, July 3, 2019 (UTC)

• Yes of course, I'll do it now!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:22, July 3, 2019 (UTC)
• All the info on the 96th + context is this: "Very little is publicly known about the mysterious Grand Admiral. He is a Chiss - a blue-skinned, red-eyed near-human from the ice-locked world of Csilla in the Unknown Regions. Much of his earlier life and service record is classified, but what little is known points to a master strategist with a prodigious intellect and a deep understanding of naval combat in all its forms. According to records, Thrawn has spent much of his career in the Outer Rim Territories leading an anti-insurgency task force responsible for eliminating rebellious activity among the Empire's holdings there. He oversaw a brilliant, if bloody, victory over insurgents at Batonn, and for that service he was promoted to Grand Admiral by Emperor Palpatine himself." Hope this helps!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:33, July 3, 2019 (UTC)
  • Oh that's brilliant. Yup there's some new info in there I'll need so thanks for that, that's really helped me out! Tommy Macaroni 21:35, July 3, 2019 (UTC)
    • Anytime! Glad I could help, good luck with the nom!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 06:10, July 4, 2019 (UTC)

Urrr'k's species[]

Hi Vitus. I understand wanting to wait for "absolute confirmation," but compare Urrr'k's appearance to this image of a female Tusken Raider:

This Tusken's appearance aligns perfectly with Urrr'k, right down to every single one of the rivets, lines, and holes on both of their helmets. LordMominutiae (talk) 03:40, July 5, 2019 (UTC)

• As I was the one that reverted first, let me tell you that it doesn't mean anything to have the same clothing and equipment. It could've been stolen from a Tusken Raider or a replica of a tusken raider outfit. I would recommend waiting for the next issues to see how the story develops and if we can get some sort of confirmation of her being a Tusken Raider and not just a wannabe--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:51, July 5, 2019 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. LordMominutiae (talk) 03:59, July 5, 2019 (UTC)

Image reverts[]

Why are you reverting my image changes, they are objectively better representations of the articles. MimbanMudGang (talk) 23:26, July 9, 2019 (UTC)

Sith Troopers (SW-9)[]

Hello there! From RU WP. Have a question. Is really new sith troopers belongs to Palpy forces? I just see your comments & thought it. Zawatsky (talk) 07:36, July 13, 2019 (UTC)

Thx! At the moment we are arguing how to translate new type into Russian. & have a problem. The fact is that belonging to the Sith is not proven, and in our language the mention of someone in the name indicates membership in the faction. I would explain:

1. Original: Sith Trooper.
2. Verbatim: Ситх-штурмовик (he's sith & he's trooper, but not proofs what private siths exists in NC).
3. If swap & agreement on cases: Штурмовик ситхов (he's trooper & he's belongs to siths - slave or some).

As you can see, we are stacked. It's really to beat the early proofs from someone? From Hidalgo, for example?
Zawatsky (talk) 05:54, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

Do you know his twitter? I don't. Rarely use twitter, prefer VK. Zawatsky (talk) 17:20, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

Chandrillan[]

Hey! I believe it’s a cruise ship for [[Chandrilla Starlines]]. There’s an ad that plays on the local radio station. I’ll check on it to confirm, though! MasterFred^(Whatever) 18:01, July 17, 2019 (UTC)

• • Still no luck. I'll keep checking around. Sorry it's taking so long. MasterFred^(Whatever) 03:02, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

Thrawn: Treason[]

I recommend you to not add anything from that Amazon preview to Wookieepedia yet. Yes, I know its available but given that its almost the entire book and has several spoilers, I would recommend you to not add anything until release date.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:05, July 19, 2019 (UTC)

Advices[]

Hi Vitus, two advices. 1) Please try to use only the field that you need in the {{WebCite}} template and 2) this makes life easier to everyvody when creating articles from excerpts and those kind of articles, instead of <ref name="Excerpt"> use the actual name of the future source in this case for example Thrawn: Treason. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:14, July 23, 2019 (UTC)

Thrawn Treason[]

Sorry about that, I pressed the wrong button woops. I tried to fix it but my internet stopped working lol. Kind regards Darth Tomotron (talk) 14:31, July 23, 2019 (UTC)

• Cheers man! Darth Tomotron (talk) 14:41, July 23, 2019 (UTC)

Rakatan[]

Do you know the new canon for where the Rakatan were mentioned?--Jkirk8907 (talk) 08:12, July 24, 2019 (UTC)

Analysis group[]

Hey Vitus, its probably best to just add the information onto the Chimaera article and then redirect the page to there --Lewisr (talk) 13:47, July 31, 2019 (UTC)

Sorry[]

Sorry I didn’t see it I really do apologize. - Red Duel 15:24, August 2, 2019 (UTC)

CAN[]

Hey Vitus, just fyi, when you move an article you don't have to also move any nomination pages it may have had. They can stay at the old name. Cheers, Tommy Macaroni 17:39, August 2, 2019 (UTC)

• Ah, alright thanks for the info! If I were to do a CANom would it then be moved? Thanks--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:41, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, if the nomination is active and you move the nominated page, you should also move the associated nomination page. Tommy Macaroni 17:43, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
    • Okay thank you. Also, while I have you here, the artist for the Rakehell titled the image as "Black Fleet Rakehell" seen here. I assume that this can't be a source for having a canon article for Black Fleet right?--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:45, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
      • Nope, that's pretty much authorial intent which we don't take as canon. Perhaps it'll be mentioned when the expansion is released (hopefully), but if not, we can't use it. Tommy Macaroni 17:48, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
        • Okay that's what I thought, I was just a tad bit hopeful and asking wouldn't hurt lol. Thanks for the help!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:48, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
          • Nah it's fine. Yes I'm hopeful that'll be mentioned in the full release too, I'm certain one of us will write that up to status if it is. Tommy Macaroni 18:05, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
• That reminds me, I was having the idea recently of us two collaborating on bringing the Seventh Fleet article to featured status if it was possible and if you are interested. I don't think I can start now but maybe in the near future we can work together on it. If that's something that you're interested in let me know, or if you want to bring it to status yourself that's also fine, it's a thought that crossed my mind a couple times. Cheers!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:34, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • Hell yeah, I'd so be up for that. It's a major article so we'd probably have to wait a safe time to make sure it's update-free, but I'd definitely be up for getting it to that level. I need to finish the 96th, and then I'd like to get the third fleet up to status too, but after that I'd defiantly be up for this. Tommy Macaroni 21:15, August 2, 2019 (UTC)
    • Awesome! Yeah take your time I'm not in a rush I got some IRL stuff to take care of and I got noms I want to pass first. I'm looking forward to it!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:54, August 2, 2019 (UTC)

Commerce Treaty of 1647[]

Hey Vitus, I wanted to know your opinion on something related to your Second Fleet CAN. The Commerce Treaty of 1647 makes the Trade Federation neutral somehow, and I wanted to know if you thought that should be addressed in the article, since it covers the Trade Federation's militia actively fighting against Republic forces. Thanks, Fan26 (Talk) 21:12, August 2, 2019 (UTC)

• Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for your time! Fan26 (Talk) 22:02, August 2, 2019 (UTC)

Onager-class[]

I didn't notice the pending status article take until after I'd made my edit. Apologies for that. I only added a cropped image for the infobox, so it focuses on the ship, and doesn't have all the useless space around it. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!}

• Hey JMAS, no worries!! In fact, thanks for the help I appreciate it! Cheers--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:43, August 4, 2019 (UTC)

2nd Fleet[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" 2nd Fleet has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Tommy Macaroni 19:28, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you!--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:35, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

Dark Lord of the Sith[]

I see that you added Darth Atrius as a Dark Lord of the Sith, but I don't see anything that indicates that. Are you assuming that just because he has the Darth title is a Dark Lord of the Sith? I'm confused about that.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:12, August 12, 2019 (UTC)

Darth Wrend[]

Hey Vitus, I saw your message on User:Omicron's page, Wrend isn't mentioned anywhere else in the novel. Good luck with your nom! --Lewisr (talk) 02:25, August 13, 2019 (UTC)

Unidentified First Order stormtrooper[]

Are there others like that in the trailer or is it just this one person? If its the only one, then saying its a specialised stormtrooper seems pretty speculative at this point --Lewisr (talk) 16:56, August 14, 2019 (UTC)

• Fair enough, maybe moving to Unidentified First Order stormtrooper variant or something might be better --Lewisr (talk) 17:07, August 14, 2019 (UTC)

Task Forces[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Task Force Antilles has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Imperators II(Talk) 15:38, August 20, 2019 (UTC)

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Task Force Organa has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Imperators II(Talk) 15:38, August 20, 2019 (UTC)

Wrend[]

Can you come on IRC? Or is there another way I can send you an ebook copy of the book? Cause right now it seems like you aren't really doing the article yourself, as you don't have the book you're essentially relying on us to tell you all the other stuff, which you can get for yourself from the book --Lewisr (talk) 13:42, August 21, 2019 (UTC)

• No worries! Hopefully now you'll be able to see, I've sent it --Lewisr (talk) 14:03, August 21, 2019 (UTC)

Hello, opportunity to talk about your post "Unidentified tank squadron"

I have some concrete proof that could embellish your subject

--Guigui2772 (talk) 22:22, August 27, 2019 (UTC)

B1 training droid[]

The Begun, The Clone Wars Have! article lists a [[B1 training droid]] under appearances. Do you know what this model is? Is it just the training B1s seen in Clone Cadets?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:16, August 28, 2019 (UTC)

85th[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" 85th has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:08, August 28, 2019 (UTC)

Alphabet Squadron[]

Sure! I have sent you an email --Lewisr (talk) 22:43, September 11, 2019 (UTC)

Onager[]

Hey Vitus, if you're done with Onager-class Star Destroyer, would you mind removing the inuse so other editors can made any further changes? Thanks. Tommy Macaroni 12:49, September 13, 2019 (UTC)

• Ah yes, thank you. Just removed--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:38, September 13, 2019 (UTC)

Is this leaked info?[]

Hi Vitus,

Look, here in these series of tweets it's revealed some juicy details surrounding about some of our beloved sequel trilogy characters in Star Wars: Episode IX The Rise of Skywalker present in the info section of their respective 6-inch Black Series action figures. However, the StarWars.com article which shows the toys doesn't show this part of the box, so I wanted to ask you whether this counts as leaked info or if we can use the article as a source?

Regards,

X9 The Android (talk) 02:15, September 27, 2019 (UTC)

Geonosian droid army[]

Hey Vitus, can you point me in the direction of what page the Geonosian droid army is mentioned on in Rise of the Separatists? Thank you! --Lewisr (talk) 03:45, September 27, 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks so much! --Lewisr (talk) 04:27, September 27, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Exar Kun[]

Hi Vitus. I've made the page with all the information available in the book so not sure it really needs expanding. Thanks, Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:13, September 27, 2019 (UTC)

Rebel starfighters[]

Considering the Rebel starfighters manual doesn't officially come out until next month, you're probably going to need to add the place where you got the info for BTL-B Y-wing fighter/bomber from --Lewisr (talk) 15:20, October 6, 2019 (UTC)

• I thought that was the case! I would say so yes, I've done similar on other pages like Allegiance and Resistance Reborn just to be safe --Lewisr (talk) 16:22, October 6, 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks! I get it's a bit confusing as it was given out, so no worries! --Lewisr (talk) 16:33, October 6, 2019 (UTC)

Chadkol Gee and Nossor Ri[]

Hi Vitus, where does the name Chadkol Gee come from? And where is confirmation its Nossor Ri? Nothing in the comic says its him --Lewisr (talk) 16:57, October 9, 2019 (UTC)

• Apologies, I completely missed that, thanks for letting me know! --Lewisr (talk) 17:07, October 9, 2019 (UTC)

Torpedo Sphere[]

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Torpedo Sphere has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Tommy Macaroni 08:42, October 10, 2019 (UTC)

Lando[]

Hello, Vitus Infinitus, I noticed that you're really good at answering questions about matters, so I wanted to find out if Lando Calrissian was ever a part of Crimson Dawn. A user has been editing on the Crimson Dawn page that Lando had a part in Crimson Dawn. He only did the job because of Qi'ra asking him to. Not because he was working for Dryden Vos, right? I'm not sure. Cheers,--Doctor Starwars (talk) 22:06, October 20, 2019 (UTC)

Talus[]

Hi Vitus, did you verified that Talus was mentioned in Gadgets and Gear?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:40, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

Exactly. Thank you! Cheers,--Doctor Starwars (talk) 14:17, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Talk pages[]

No problems! Jr Mime deserves some credit as well. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 22:40, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Inuse[]

I had just published all I've written so far, so you didn't mess anything up. No worries! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:17, October 23, 2019 (UTC)

Mistake?[]

Hey Vitus, I noticed you recently made a page today, and in the infobox of the character you named it "Rersey"... is this the characters name? Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 16:54, October 23, 2019 (UTC)

• No problem! Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 17:00, October 23, 2019 (UTC)

Fourth Sister[]

As long its in the script, yes its okay to add the real name. Be sure to upload a screenshot of that tweet for archival purposes--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:27, October 23, 2019 (UTC)

Trench[]

I was going to remove it, but I decided to ak before I did. At 2:29 in the Clone Wars Revival trailer, I saw Admiral Trench, which is crazy since I thought Anakin killed him already. But anyway, I was going to remove his death.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8tKum3cpnw What do you think? Cheers,Doctor Starwars^Talk

Ohhh, okay. I'm thankful I asked before doing it! Thank you!Doctor Starwars^Talk

Thanks![]

Thanks for helping me on Ajan Kloss, when I created the page, I tried finding the monopoly game for it but only found it on Amazon. I didn't know Amazon could be used as a source, so I kept searching. Thanks for the help. --Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 17:21, October 29, 2019 (UTC)

Rescue on Chimaera[]

I left a message on this talk page about the article's name. Is moving it logical? --Rakhsh (talk) 15:03, October 31, 2019 (UTC)

Whale fleet[]

Hey Vitus, if you read the Vader comic, it uses the name Cylo's whale fleet. I just wanted to let you know, because there might be a reason you put the conjecture template up.--Doctor Starwars^Talk 02:54, November 1, 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!--Doctor Starwars^Talk 16:08, November 1, 2019 (UTC)

Question[]

In what way, shape, or form was i vandilizing? —Unsigned comment by X0Nightmare0x (talk • contribs).

Chapt 1 Mando[]

See "The Asset"--Jkirk8907 (talk) 14:17, November 12, 2019 (UTC)

Why put The Mandalorian back into Chussido appearances[]

Did you get confirmation of identity? talk SW-CanonDetailer01 02:38, November 14, 2019 (UTC)

Defancio Storsilt species[]

After seeing a message about you on Chussido I was wondering if I could ask you something. I think I know the alien from The Last Jedi Defancio Storsilt’s species he’s a horse humanoid. I think he’s a canonical version of a Thakwaash. I was wondering if you could ask like Leland Chee, a concept artist from the Last Jedi, or any other member of the Lucasfilm group if it’s true? SW-CanonDetailer01 talkSW-CanonDetailer01 05:02, November 15, 2019 (UTC)

Tense[]

Hi Vitus, I'm not sure why you occasionally use the wrong tense but you'd think after just under 3 years and 26k edits on the site you'd have grasped what tense to use. Please take more care --Lewisr (talk) 16:48, November 23, 2019 (UTC)

• No problem! We all feel it sometimes so I understand, its more about just checking before you hit save changes --Lewisr (talk) 16:51, November 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • Easy to do! But no worries --Lewisr (talk) 17:10, November 23, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Paz Vizla[]

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner, but no problem at all, and apologies that I didn't see the article with the proper name in the first place! — Hunter Kahn 18:47, November 23, 2019 (UTC)

Tenebrous Legion[]

Hi Vitus -- I'm reading through the Ep IX Visual Dictionary as well, and I think you might have the formatting wrong for this. The way I'm reading it is that the 26th Legion is also known as the Tenebrous Legion, not literally as "26th: Tenebrous Legion". The text above states "These are numerically identified, but also given the name of an ancient Sith Lord." - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 17:03, December 20, 2019 (UTC)

Revan/Canon[]

I've moved the page Revan (Sith Lord) to Revan/Canon. Much easier to do it like that :) - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 18:03, December 20, 2019 (UTC)

No problems. Also, I've marked Andeddu and [[Andeddu (Sith Lord)]] for merging -- the Legends version is Darth Andeddu. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 18:06, December 20, 2019 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, I assumed you did it since you were creating all the Legion pages and with all the editing activity going on, didn't want to create unnecessary editing conflicts. Thanks for merging though! - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 18:11, December 20, 2019 (UTC)

Free Worlds Fleet[]

Would you mind answering to this question, since you created the article. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:47, December 22, 2019 (UTC)

Resistance Navy[]

Sorry I know that this was along time ago but why did you change the List into (I do not know what) here https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Resistance_navy?diff=prev&oldid=7744025 I am only wondering because I think it was more easier to see what ships was in the Resistance Navy if it is a list. Unless that was not the whole Idea of that Section TheDeathStar3 (talk) 05:55, December 28, 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations[]

Thanks Vitus, it means a lot! Yeah I guess something should be done with the awards to try encourage their usage, might be worth bringing up somewhere. Didn't even know that one existed, but thanks once again! --Lewisr (talk) 01:06, January 7, 2020 (UTC)

• Sounds good! Look forward to seeing what happens --Lewisr (talk) 01:16, January 7, 2020 (UTC)

Fantasy Flight Games article[]

There is a recent Fantasy Flight Games article on their website titled “New Models”. Do you think this could be used as a source? We do have a FFG article used as a source on the Davin Felth page. I was wondering what your opinion on this was.

(I suppose I would link it under sources and not external links like I have done with other FFG articles)--Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:00, January 15, 2020 (UTC)

Covers[]

Hi Vitus, if you're going to replace a placeholder cover for the real cover, be sure to create this. So we have up to date our cover gallery. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:59, February 4, 2020 (UTC)

Comprehensiveness of the Imperial Intelligence article[]

Hi Vitus, just wanting to know what needs to be added to Imperial Intelligence. The article seems to be fairly thorough. Kind regards Tomotron (talk) 04:41, February 7, 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks for your reply. I'm glad you can help in finishing this article off. Tomotron (talk) 23:00, February 7, 2020 (UTC)

Your Workbench[]

I’m just here to note you should change “Team Colossus” to be Colossus resistance on User:Vitus Infinitus/Workbench 2. I explained why this happened on Talk:Team Colossus, but you are free to object to this on that talk page.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:46, February 8, 2020 (UTC)

Starships and Speeders[]

First, I'd like to say that you are doing a pretty good job at creating new articles from Starships and Speeders. If you have time, I'd like to ask you a favor. Could you please tell me if the book mentions the Dreadnought-class or the sandspeeder? Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 06:21, February 27, 2020 (UTC)

• Awesome! Well, you can send it to me either through IRC or one of my social media accounts that I've linked to my Wikia profile. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:48, February 27, 2020 (UTC)

Victory[]

Vitus, we know the Victory-class is a line purely because of the existence of the Victory II. If a ship class has a I or II suffix, it's of a line by nature. As we don't know the difference between the Victory II, and what we can assume is the I, that current page is the best one to turn into the line page, so all information remains. This is the exact same thing done at Raider-class corvette. Besides, that book also talks about ISDs and ISD IIs in the same category (ISDs therefore meaning ISD Is), so the Victory-class it refers to is likely actually the Victory I. Not that that's enough to make an article of course. Tommy Macaroni 15:32, March 1, 2020 (UTC)

• Okay, that sounds good to me. Thanks for clarifying.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:20, March 2, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Starships and Speeders[]

Hello there! What is it that you want to know exactly? --Lelal Mekha ^{(Audience Room)} 08:27, March 2, 2020 (UTC)

• Never mind, I see that you found another way. =) --Lelal Mekha ^{(Audience Room)} 08:31, March 2, 2020 (UTC)

Secutor-class[]

Hi Vitus, if you look at the infobox for the class, it says "battlecruiser" for the hull type, rather than "battlecarrier", which must mean it's a battlecruiser. The word "battlecarrier" would only be a designation of the canon ship rather than the type e.g. the Executor-class has an SSD designation, but it's actually a type of Star Dreadnought. What do you think? Kind regards —Tomotron ^{(Star Forge)} 02:48, March 3, 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks for your opinion and reply Vitus. Don't worry, I'll respect of wishes of Tommy regardless of the outcome. Kind regards —Tomotron ^{(Star Forge)} 03:18, March 3, 2020 (UTC)

Pelta-class frigate[]

Hey Vitus! I've recently been updating Pelta-class frigate for Starships and Speeders, and I found something interesting. I know that you nominated the Pelta-class frigate for featured, and you added in the BTS that in Divide and Conquer, Phoenix Cell is shown having another Pelta-class, and that no other sources indicate they ever obtained another one, and that the article assumes that it was an error. Well, I've found another source. In Starships and Speeders, on the Phoenix Home page, in Adventure and Encounter seeds, it reads "The Alliance has obtained another Pelta-class frigate and has converted it to match the specifications of Phoenix Home. PC's are assigned to the new warship for its shakedown cruise which includes a strike operation against a lightly defended imperial sensor post." Does this mean that Divide and Conquer was correct? And if so, should this be inserted into the article? Thanks,--CommanderDeviss327AЧ dAwu I qɹokǝ ɹǝฉ1iʇʎ ฉБa1u 17:41, March 12, 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks! Just to be clear, Adventure and Encounter seeds are canon, right? I don't want to go and do something before I know I can.--CommanderDeviss327AЧ dAwu I qɹokǝ ɹǝฉ1iʇʎ ฉБa1u 18:56, March 12, 2020 (UTC)

Praetor-II[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Praetor II-class ship has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Fan26 (Talk) 22:53, March 12, 2020 (UTC)

Ghostfinder fleet[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Ghostfinder fleet has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Zed42 (talk) 20:27, March 13, 2020 (UTC)

Sith armada[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Sith armada has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 14:25, March 16, 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Workshop for Discussions[]

Hi Vitus! We spoke briefly last week about starting some sort of workshop-type thread series to help some of the interested users from the Discussions community learn more about wiki editing. Wondering if you have had a chance to brainstorm any ideas for it and thought of who else might be interested in leading such activities. Looking forward to collaborating! Givinname (talk) 17:34, March 16, 2020 (UTC)

Warning: Talk pages[]

Hi Vitus, just a reminder that per our Talk page policy you shouldn't be creating talk pages just to add a WookieeProject template. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:50, March 17, 2020 (UTC)

87th Sentinel Corps[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" 87th Sentinel Corps has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Fan26 (Talk) 19:44, April 2, 2020 (UTC)

41st & Reserve fleet[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" 41st Ranger Platoon has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 02:19, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" Unidentified reserve fleet has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — —spookywillowwtalk 02:19, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

New Category[]

Hello, I've recently discovered that a [[:Category:Weapons of the Grand Army of the Republic|category]] was created for the weapons of the Grand Army of the Republic, and it lists all of their weapons. Since this category was created for their weapons, I was contemplating on creating categories for the weaponry of the Confederacy of Independent Systems, the Galactic Empire, the Rebel Alliance, the First Order, and maybe the New Republic and the Resistance. If you respond to this message, even though our motto is to be bold, I would like to hear what your thoughts are on me creating these categories. --Erebus Chronus (talk) 16:18, April 9, 2020 (UTC)

The One-Eight-One Division[]

"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?" 181st Armor Division has been approved by the EduCorps and awarded Comprehensive status. Feel free to add the {{User CA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The EduCorps thanks you for your efforts and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Fan26 (Talk) 16:17, April 10, 2020 (UTC)