Baby_King_Bob
No Longer a Noob
- Jan 14, 2004
- 7,607
- 466
Reading comprehension is an amazing thing, like when I said "Let me put it this way, I wouldn't have complained if it stood, but I believe the right call was to reverse."I for one think that, by the standards of overturning that the NHL has been using all year, where anything remotely close to inconclusive is returned as "Not clear enough evidence to overturn, the call on the ice stands", that this should have been the call here too
that's my issue as well. anyone watching the game, even (or especially?) casual/new fans, who isn't husker would have understood the call on the ice standing. so not only did they turn off a lot of people watching the game, confused new and old fans alike, and created a huge distraction, they've also set themselves up for a major controversy. just plain fucking stupid all around.
The NHL has been consistent in their standing on what is and is not "possession". That wasn't possession. Want to change the rule, call the league office.
not at all surprising you expect people to read and remember every fucking one of your posts. anyone who posts random 'dear diary' type shit to twitter, facebook, message boards, etc. like you do here, is usually pretty full of themselves