Rothana[]

• Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 21:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: This will be the tenth location from the Rebel Files Ringbreaker map being brought to status, leaving three remaining locations on there (let's be honest though Corellian Industrial Cluster is the only feasible one left).
• Word count at nomination time: 1767 words (281 introduction, 1325 body, 161 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST, WP:CO, WP:FFGAMES, WP:NOVELS, WP:THR

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support[]

UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) (Vote struck per policy: Banned user -- —spookywilloww^talk 00:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC))

1. Wok142 (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
2. —spookywilloww^talk 14:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
3. Lewisr (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Object[]

ThrawnChiss7[]

• "From 31 ABY" sounds off to me; I think that "in" would be a better choice of word. What do you think? ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 22:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm trying to convey a time range, so "from" makes more sense to me.
• The mention in Chronicles of the Jedi can surely be used as a quote in the "corporate politics" section, and maybe deserves a mention in the body. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 22:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
  • The Chronicles mention isn't a quote from a character as far as I know, so can't be used in {{Quote}}. I also think that the sheltering thing is more relevant to the walker and RHE than the planet, which is why I've omitted that info. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 14:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
    • I don't have Chronicles, but Roland Quarry treats it as a quote from Harli Cogra in their in-universe Chronicles of the Jedi. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 16:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
      • I've looked it over a bit but to be completely honest, the text in which the walker is mentioned comes across a bit non-fictional for me to want in the article, even if that in itself is technically IU writing. I also think that it's not that relevant to the article's body as it's just the walker being noted. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 02:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
        • Eh, I dunno. I think it would be better to use for the quote and mention it in the body as because it is an IU writing, but I don't have super strong feelings about it. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 03:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
• It's also mentioned in book by Poe Dameron, in RHE's name with regards to the LAAT/i and the AT-TE. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 23:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Currently links to a Legends page. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
    • The link has been fixed, ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 13:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
      • Just looked at the info for this one too, and I'd say it's also not relevant to the body as it's just the fact RHE produced the two being noted and nothing specific to the planet Rothana itself. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 15:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
• Star Wars: Build the Millennium Falcon 74 (Starship Fact File: Terrapin-class Bulk Tanker) states of the Terrapin-class: "Marrying the toughness and durability of Rothana's ground vehicles, with the ingenious design cues of the likes of Desando Dynamics' successful heavy transport series, the new transport/walker hybrid certainly did fulfil those promises." I'm pretty sure this is referring to the corporation, but it does just use "Rothana", so I'll leave it up to you on how you want to phrase it. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 12:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Sorry for the delay. Looking through this, the info itself looks more relevant to the company in my opinion, but it's otherwise chill being in the sources. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 10:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Imp[]

• Seems like the Galactic Republic planets category is missing.
• Can some of the infobox fields be populated to support the Ice planets category and reflect the physical description info that's present in the Description section? Imperators II^(Talk) 09:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 22:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Uber[]

• This is worth mentioning somewhere in the body. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
• It appears the precedent is to treat the appearance templates as separate entities and should thus be fully linked. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 22:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Wok[]

• Can you give more context to the sentence "which could profit from Rothana's rich soil" in Corporate politics? Wok142 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
• In the intro, you use "Around 31 BBY" to describe the time period where RDE built Republic ships, but in the Building for an army section, you reference this time period with 32 BBY. I think it would make the most sense to use the same number in both instances to be the most clear to readers. Wok142 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 22:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
• Note: I was a little braver with the copy-edits this time, so you can inspect that here and let me know about anything you'd prefer to hash out. Wok142 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

spookly[]

• To echo ThrawnChiss's point above, after consulting with some other folk, the Chronicles of the Jedi quote tbf does have to be included as the quote for that section (unless there is another quote for that section that would trump it); and the book itself's publication should be documented IU. We have a good 25-30 or so that treat it as such and we have the dating, author, and preferred formatting set up pretty decently so it shouldn't be more than a copy paste in. The primary reasoning for this (to also be tinkered around with) is that everything sent to Valo (a middle-of-nowhere place) is from its origin planet, so [Rothana] sent those Rothana walkers there, which was then documented in the IU book.—spookywilloww^talk 01:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Very well, added. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 09:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
    • I do mean the actual IU one-liner in the history as well, to echo the rest of the status articles that use the same line.—spookywilloww^talk 16:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Very well. How's this? Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 12:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
• The reference for 'arctic' between the infobox and Description should be made consistent.
  • Done. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 14:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
• Fauna is generally mentioned in Description instead of Inhabitants if a creature and non-sentient; Pijal comes to mind offhand, though is also done most other places too from eyeing Legends FAs. It seems that in Inhabitants, the whelmer is being described as a creature—if that is the case, it should be moved up. Or, if a species proper, then the other aspects altered to match.—spookywilloww^talk 18:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  • That practice doesn't make sense to me. Any species is an inhabitant if it's from there. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 14:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
    • The precedent is overwhelmingly to have Description describe the aspects of the world not originating with the activities of sentient beings, e.g. its location, geology, geography, and fauna and flora, and in the Inhabitants describe the sentient residents of the world. And this is explicitly supported by the Layout Guide as well. Imperators II^(Talk) 15:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. Changed. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 08:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments[]