Picture Change Archives 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 |
Picture Change Guidelines[]
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete {{fair use}} and {{fair use rationale}} templates attached to them or else they will be rejected.
Votes[]
How to vote:
|
|
- Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:
# {{Support}} Your reason/comment ~~~~
# {{Oppose}} Your reason/comment ~~~~
Only one "Support" vote per user. Votes will be open only for a week of the initial pic being placed. At the end of the week the highest rated pic will win. If no pick is a clear winner, than an admin with pick the pic. If another pic is brought up after the picture is picked then the voting begins again with the pic that has already been picked and the new pic or pics.
Picture Change Candidates[]
Quincy[]
The key visual features plot-relevant Quincies instead of generic, poorly-drawn no names. Lightning Laxus (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Support - I don't see the harm, especially since the Shinigami and Arrancar pages shows the Captains and Espada members as examples. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 03:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kenpachi Zaraki[]
For this one I was trying to find one that is close enough to the manga version.Greatsage92 (talk) 00:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Support - For Proposal 2. Timjer (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - Proposal 2 looks good to me. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose - Still prefer the manga version for the detail and lighting here.--Xilinoc (talk) 05:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Izuru Kira[]
Support - Both look good to me. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 23:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Yhwach (1000 Years ago)[]
Uploaded an alternative from the manga that we can replace when the anime reaches the Bazz-B flashback.--Xilinoc (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Support - For Manga; if we're gonna represent it, there's no need to choose a black-and-white image over a colored one just because it's from the anime.--Xilinoc (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Support - Also for the Manga. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 04:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Shelby[]
Support - Yeah, the anime/movie one is a clear improvement.--Xilinoc (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Dragon Form[]
Support - I like propsal 2 its closest to the manga version without any parts of him being croppedoff.Greatsage92 (talk) 03:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)#
Support -
Support - Yeah, Proposal 2 is the best of the bunch.--Xilinoc (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Osushi[]
Dragon Form[]
Partial Form[]
Support - I found some alternate options for Osushi's Partial Transformation and Base Form, which have him facing forward. I think the Proposal pic of his partial is simply adorable so it has my vote.Greatsage92 (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Support - Yeah, this new one works better.--Xilinoc (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Osushi Normal Form[]
Support - Front-facing is worth more than having his whole butt in the shot.--Xilinoc (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Image Requests[]
Anime Images[]
Could we add these Types of dragons to the Dragon/Image Gallery? The species are listed next to them.Greatsage92 (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Figured I might as well request this for Hiyori Sarugaki/Image Gallery. Whether it's "better" than and should replace Hiyori's 2003 profile image could be argued either way, but that's not what I'm requesting. Gorade01 (talk) 18:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Manga Images[]
Movie Images[]
Novel Images[]
Game Images[]
GIFs[]
New Gallery Requests[]
Gallery Requests Archive |
New wiki background and possible logo changes[]
I was playing around with some of the Burn the Witch assets I found and made some new wiki background concepts. I made a background, a "header banner" and a new logo. Do you guys like any of the new concepts?
--LemursLet's Play
16:11, August 24, 2020 (UTC)
Support - Been wanting a new header banner for a while now but the editor kept glitching so I never got to fool around with it - your proposal looks great. Same with the new logo and background, as much as I love the final arc and as much as our current logo has grown on me, right now it's BTW time (I'd be open to bringing back this BG when the anime starts airing again, though, then maybe capping it all off with a "dual banner" of Ichigo/Rukia/Noel/Ninny after it's all said and done).--Xilinoc (talk) 16:29, August 24, 2020 (UTC)
Yeah I’m open for a “dual background” and I would have done one, but there isn’t any key art for the anime yet, so I think this will do fine for the moment. --LemursLet's Play
16:37, August 24, 2020 (UTC)
Support the wordmark and banner, but not the background. Its time for a change I think, but it should be the characters and it should include proper Bleach characters first and foremost. While its only right that BtW be acknowledged since its the only new content right now, it shouldnt supersede the original which is 95%+ of what the wiki is about. ~~Ууp <talk> 09:12, August 25, 2020 (UTC)
- Agree with Yyp. I support the wordmark and banner as well. While I admit the proposed background looks awesome, it kinda detracts from the fact that this wiki is still primarily about Bleach, not its spinoff. Timjer (talk) 09:23, August 25, 2020 (UTC)
I can refine the logo a bit (I was doing it on the fly) and move on using the header if all parties agree.--LemursLet's Play
20:33, August 25, 2020 (UTC)
I created another logo concept
![Bleach Wiki wordart 2020](https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/bleach/images/4/4e/Bleach_Wiki_wordart_2020.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/180?cb=20200826200736&path-prefix=en)
another logo concept
--LemursLet's Play
20:08, August 26, 2020 (UTC)
Managed to add the banner pic. Took a surprising amount of cropping, resizing to get it positioned right. Im sure itll surprise nobody that it doesnt show up on the Discussion page... ~~Ууp <talk> 14:02, October 15, 2020 (UTC)