Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Willis Tower2

Reason: This is one of the most photographed buildings in the world from a great angle. It has high EV on WP, but failed at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Willis Tower2.
Articles this image appears in: Chicago
Willis Tower
List of architects of supertall buildings
Creator: Daniel Schwen (User:Dschwen)

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Neutral It failed on mostly EV grounds because at this angle it appears to be the same height as the building next too it, and there is a CLEAR difference in their heights. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 05:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll change to neutral for the article Willis Tower, but I still have my reservations about the angle and visual effect of the building's heights. — raeky T 22:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Raeky actually makes some good points, but these images are good, they deserve some kind of acknowledgement. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad someone feels so.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support original I think it has good EV in showing the tower in its urban context, seen from the river, and a good educational value due to the real perspective effect which allows a better understanding of its (absolute) height than the perspective corrected version. However I think placing it twice in the article is overdone.... --Elekhh (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support original per Elekhh. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support original per Elekhh. Nev1 (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chicago Sears Tower.jpg --Jujutacular ^talk 14:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]