Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Donald Rumsfeld

Donald Rumsfeld[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2010 at 00:03:55 (UTC)

Reason

Yes this is another official portrait. This is a high EV image. I am unsure if it is considered an exemplary official portrait and await your feedback.

Articles in which this image appears

Donald Rumsfeld
United States Secretary of Defense
List of Eagle Scouts (Boy Scouts of America)
List of New Trier High School alumni
Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 1988
List of White House Chiefs of Staff

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

U.S. Military

• Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak oppose. Looking at the image at 100% magnification, there is noticeable noise/compression artifacts in the background - it looks like it was very slightly digitally enlarged. XeroJavelin (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose For a scan of a silver-based photograph, the quality seems quite good. The contrast—I think—is a little low. But I keep wrestling with how these generic U.S. Gov. portraits can be considered as FP material; they really should be remarkable in some way that makes them truly stand out in their genre. Greg L (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I am rare in that I actually like these- the quality is there, the EV is there. I'm happy to see this as an FP. J Milburn (talk) 15:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose To many compression artifacts. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 03:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Raeky, XeroJavelin --Banzoo (talk) 15:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Seems to have a red cast, although this is probably due in part to bug 19960. Kaldari (talk) 01:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • What are compression artifacts and can the graphics lab make any sort of correction?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • JPEG compression is a lossy compression, i.e. it looses image data in an intelligent way to reduce file size. The more compressed it is the more it looses. If you look at the full res file, you'll see blocky squarish compression artifacts. There is nothing that can be done to recover the lost image data. Either find a far less compressed source file or accept the image data is forever lost. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 01:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • See compression artifact (WHAAOE, you know...) Matt Deres (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Very Weak Oppose The picture is uneven, there is much more room on the left above the torso, and he is leaning to the side in a very obvious matter, however, high EV. --Iankap99 (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• how is that a problem? This is not the Vitruvian Man. Thoraeton (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed but it looks very unnatural. --Iankap99 (talk) 17:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Oppose due to compression artifacts. Matt Deres (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support This image is crisp. Gut Monk (talk) 00:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'm unfamiliar with the WP language. What does "EV" stand for? Gut Monk (talk) 00:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Educational Value — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 00:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Encyclopedic Value ;) Makeemlighter (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, Encyclopedic Value. J Milburn (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I like educational :D but really they mean the same thing. *cough* — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 12:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I would be inclined to disagree; they certainly have different connotations. A diagram may be educational, but, for instance, a portrait of a minor celebrity or obscure politician is not as clearly "educational". J Milburn (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]