User talk:Redranger241

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jack Sugden has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — Insanity Incarnate 19:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jack Sugden constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sex and the City (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Frickative 12:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding any of this back in to the various articles, please provide a citable, reliable source for the information.

What you have been adding reads as a fan's pipe dream casting, nothing more.

Thanks, - J Greb (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Watchmen (film). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Alientraveller (talk) 19:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:FUTFILMS. Articles about future films should not exist until filming has begun, unless the fact it has not been made yet is notable (eg. all the shenanigans that went on to cause delays to The Hobbit or Inglorious Bastards) Iron Man 2 and two paragraphs can happily sit within the main article. Alientraveller (talk) 12:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Movingboxes (talk) 13:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on That Guy with the Glasses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, That Guy with the Glasses, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Guy with the Glasses (2nd nomination). Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

And this is not the first time I've seen you add unverified information; just the first time I had to revert you solely. Alientraveller (talk) 17:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, please don't keep adding unsourced voice actors to Wikipedia. Mathewignash (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Peter Venkman. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you logging off and then making the disruptive edits under an anonymous ISP? Those are logged and recorded too you know. Mathewignash (talk) 11:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mathewignash (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you better have a source or their gonna get deleted but not by me im not getting involved Baller449 (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Anthony Anderson, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Mathewignash (talk) 17:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 10:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop changing around the voice actors from the article. The info you're adding has been long debunked. uKER (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Disturbed. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 猛禽22 ^•• 23:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not go through this again. You're only going to get blocked... longer. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 01:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with The Avengers (2012 film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.-5- (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Speedy Deletion request for Bruce Wayne has been declined. No reason given for speedy deletion request. Please do not frivolously post deletion requests. -- Alexf^(talk) 18:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Until Saban makes an official statement that the two are related, then we here at Wikipedia are not allowed to make that statement. I don't care if you can tell that the two are identical, that's not allowed under our rules.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add any content to Wikipedia that is only known because the Power Rangers fandom has been following the production of the show. We don't know any cast members' names because there are no reliable sources to state their names.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bane Tom Hardy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Justin Bieber, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Bieber: Never Say Never. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 21:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bane Tom Hardy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That Guy with the Glasses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Guy with the Glasses (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]