Talk:Verghese Kurien/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 13:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: That Tired Tarantula (talk · contribs) 06:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article during this week. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 05:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@That Tired Tarantula Thanks for taking this up. Will address the comments as they come. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

First look[edit]

Criteria[edit]

• No maintenance templates: Y
• Relavent images are present: Y
• No recent edit wars: Y
• Nominator is a signifcant contributor: Y

Copyright[edit]

• No copyright violations/plagiarism: There's one sentence in the lead and nationwide expansion section ("In 1979, he founded the Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA) to groom managers for the cooperatives.") that's copied from the Hindustan Times, so it needs to be reworded. Other than that, there's no copyvios. Y
• Images are free (unless a rationale is given if they are not) and tagged: * Images are free (unless a rationale is given if they are not) and tagged: In the last two images' rationales (which need to be tagged as having rationales, because currently, there's a rationale given, but there's a tag on the files with instructions for adding how a rationale has been given in a template), it says that the images should be used to represent a gathering of individuals who are deceased and for whom there is no known representation under a free license, but there is an image similar to the second image in the article that is under a CC license in Commons, so using the image that is currently in the article violates fair use.

I am bit confused. If my understanding is right, as it states that "and for whom there is no known representation under a 'free' license" and there is an another image, it violates the copyright, right? So, I will remove the image and that will solve the problem?

Yes, the image needs to be replaced. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 00:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Y[reply]

Thanks for removing the other image; could you please add the image on Commons to the article so that it can be used instead? That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 19:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have added the image from commons. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose[edit]

Broadness and focus[edit]

The article stays on topic and has in-depth coverage of its subject. Looks good

Writing and MoS[edit]

There's a couple small errors in the article, but I'll be happy to do cleanup as long as the GA passes. Everything follows MoS.

Neutrality[edit]

Due weight is given and there's no editorialism.

References[edit]

Evaluating sources[edit]

Citation accuracy[edit]

Overall[edit]