Jump to content

Talk:Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Famous Hobo (talk · contribs) 02:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 16:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Initial comments[edit]

  • There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 29.6% in similarity.
  • There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  • The article is stable.
  • No previous GA reviews.

General comments[edit]

  • Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
    • No issues were found in the lede.
    • The rest of the article also looks good. I did not find any grammar errors.
  • Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
    • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
    • No referencing issues.
    • Listed references are reliable. Good job on archiving.
    • Spotchecked Ref 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 13, 16, 22, 23, 31, 32–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
      • Composers (in the infobox) are not mentioned in the text and are not sourced.
    • Copyvio already checked.
  • Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
    • The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
  • Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
    • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
  • Checking whether the article is stable.
    • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
  • Checking images.
    • All looks good.

Final comments[edit]

@Famous Hobo: Everything appears to be okay. I'll promote the article when the composers get added to the text, with a reference backing up that of course. I'll put the review on hold for a week. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vacant0: We meet again! Added alt text to the images and added a reference for the composers. Famous Hobo (talk) 03:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Everything looks good now. Promoting. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fallout:_Brotherhood_of_Steel/GA1&oldid=1232753206"