6

Let's say you have a PhD, and they have a PhD, and you are familiar with each others' work, but you never met personally. Would you address them as "Dear Dr. Smith" in an email, or "Dear John"?

A further source of awkwardness: Suppose you are addressing several people at the same time, and some do not have a PhD yet, do you write "Dear Dr. Williams, Mr. Johnson and Dr. Smith"?

6
  • 2
    This depends more on the field than anything else. Please specify what field you have in mind.
    – Sverre
    Commented Jul 2 at 13:12
  • 2
    With great vengeance and furious anger?
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jul 3 at 17:08
  • 10
    What ho, fellow boffin.
    – Alan B
    Commented Jul 4 at 14:48
  • 2
    I only call my PhD friends Dr XX whenever they do a big fuckup, to gently mock them. Otherwise its closer to "mate". Commented Jul 4 at 15:12
  • 4
    I have avoided this question during my entire PhD by starting my email by just "Hello,"
    – JackRed
    Commented Jul 4 at 18:06

4 Answers 4

5

Dear Barbara (if I may),

Xyz.

Kind Regards, Carla

Don't ever Mr., Ms. or Mrs. (urgh) anyone because it gets gross quickly for anyone who is not cis, and you don't want to assume their gender.

19
  • 9
    "it's gets gross quickly for anyone who is not a cis male" Pardon me, but, I would like to make you aware that this exactly is gender discrimination of cis males.
    – Hjan
    Commented Jul 4 at 14:16
  • 1
    @Hjan Most cis males I'm acquainted with do not find this gross (though a minority do). When you're explicitly talking about gendered aspects of societal convention, I don't think it's discrimination to acknowledge the fact it affects (typical members of) different groups differently. (I'm not sure it's important to include that information in this answer, but that's another matter entirely.)
    – wizzwizz4
    Commented Jul 4 at 16:30
  • 1
    @wizzwizz4 surely if it is "gross" it is equally gross for anyone who isn't cis. I don't understand why cis males should be singled out in particular. I am sure you have seen may cis females, for example, understandably objecting to being called "Mr". I edited the relevant part of the answer since I honestly think this was just a typo or editing error (also confirmed by the errant "it's").
    – terdon
    Commented Jul 4 at 17:06
  • 1
    Also, I see that "cis" was previously "cis male," and the seeming implication from that version of the statement that being called "Ms." is perceived as gross by all cisgender (and transgender) women is facially incorrect.
    – Obie 2.0
    Commented Jul 4 at 21:48
  • 1
    When it comes to titles, there's an easy solution, see what title is used on their staff page or in the staff directory and use that. If they get offended over it that's not your fault, that's the university's problem. Commented 2 days ago
20

The hurdles to address someone by first name are very small in British academia. Being mutually acquainted with each others papers, or eg being introduced via a common acquaintance, are definitely enough to make using the first name acceptable.

If you are using a formal mode of address, you should get it right though. That indeed means using "Prof" for professors (associate professors are not professors in the UK), using Dr for everyone else with a PhD, and Mr/Ms for those without.

6
  • 2
    using the first name acceptable --- Unless in a movie or TV show, where it seems even close colleagues ALWAYS refer to each other as Doctor or Professor. This is one of those "Hollywood things" that I don't know whether the people involved simply don't know any better (presumably these people never overhead their college/university professors talking among themselves when these people were walking through hallway corridors to their classes or at any other time) or whether these people are doing this because they think this is what viewers expect (who also presumably never . . .). Commented Jul 2 at 10:59
  • 17
    As with all things, there are subtlies. So the hurdles to using first names are small in British academia, but they are not non-existiant. If you have no connection at all to someone, I would use Dr./Prof. I would also use title-lastname on my first email to someone, then probably revert to first name after that. Commented Jul 2 at 12:27
  • 6
    @MWB I might well use it regardless if its my first ever email to someone, although not if I knew them very well. Also important here is respective seniority. I would definately always use formal address for my first ever email to someone more senior than me. Commented Jul 2 at 14:18
  • 3
    @DaveLRenfro It's not just academia. I've been on a first-name basis with every boss, colleague, and customer I've had in the US computer industry for over 40 years. Yet Hollywood usually shows much more formality than I've ever experienced.
    – Barmar
    Commented Jul 2 at 17:07
  • 1
    Conversely, when I was an undergrad I called all my professors "professor ___", even when I knew they probably would have preferred their first names. Was it a sign of respect? Sort of but that's not the real reason. I'm just a big Futurama fan and I get a kick out of calling anyone professor.
    – Thierry
    Commented Jul 2 at 17:32
9

Generally, "Hi John".

If you're in a formal setting, they're particularly accomplished, and it's the first time you've met them, maybe "Doctor X" but that would generally be the exception and, in my experience they will almost always tell you to use their first name.

If you're emailing, having never spoken to them before, Dr X might be more appropriate for the initial email and then go with whatever they respond with from there.

Now, you might get the odd stuffy one but in my experience next to nobody cares and most people are more than happy with just being called their name.

2
  • 2
    This is the correct answer in my experience. If I was emailing someone particularly senior and famous I would maybe look up their title, otherwise I'm going to go with "Hi firstname". The thing that throws me is when someone signs their email with a particularly informal feeling name (e.g. Deborah signs an email "Debs"), but I make myself respond with whatever name they signed with even if it feels weirdly informal.
    – deee
    Commented Jul 3 at 14:30
  • Considering that the first contact is almost always e-mail, and the OP asks explicitly for a situation where they are familiar with the person's work but have never actually met, I would almost always go for "Dr X" or "Prof X" (whichever is correct, as listed on their staff page) for first contact. While true that 99% of the time, it will indeed converge to "Hi John" after a single round of e-mails, in my experience cold e-mails starting with "Hi Firstname" tend to be spam so I'm not particularly endeared to them.
    – penelope
    Commented 2 days ago
6

If you've never communicated with an academic before, best to play it safe and address them either as Dr. Lastname or Prof. Lastname. Be absolutely sure to check which title they use by going on to the university or institution website (professor is an earned title in the UK, and most academics are not professors). If they don't have a PhD (they might be a student) then usual title conventions apply.

Include your full name (including your title) in your message if communicating in writing. If they address you with your first name and/or don't use their title in their response, then you can safely assume, at least in writing and one-on-one conversations, that you're on first name terms now, and should from then on communicate as such. I find most academics tend to prefer first name terms nowadays.

One important thing to note is if you're conversing with them with an audience. Some academics will be happy for you to be causal with them privately or with a group of other academics, or perhaps even PhD students, but they will be bothered if you don't use their title when introducing them or conversing with them with a group of undergraduates listening in, for example.

8
  • 1
    "Include your full name" -- to clarify, are you referring to the email signature, or the message itself? Here in the US, at least, I finish the message with my first name as a signal that it's OK to use it.
    – MWB
    Commented Jul 2 at 19:29
  • 2
    Include your full name (including your title) in your message if communicating in writing Signing off with your title may indicate to the other party you want to be addressed by it, which in a UK context would be rather unusual but they will be bothered if you don't use their title when introducing them or conversing with them with a group of undergraduates listening in, for example. In the UK anyone who was bothered by this would come off as having absurd delusions of grandeur, given undergrads more often than not use first names with lecturers.
    – MJeffryes
    Commented Jul 3 at 13:51
  • 1
    @MJeffryes If you're concerned about your first point, then you can use your full name or first name without your title and then include a signature block below with your title. That's pretty common in emails. As for your second point, I think it is important to remember that firstly UK academics are a very diverse bunch and may have come from cultures with different expectations of formality, and secondly it's not nessecarily about ego, it could be seen as showing the undergrads formal etiquette (which might help if they interact with other academics outside the UK). Commented Jul 3 at 20:52
  • 2
    @Crazymoomin On the second point, I just don't think your answer is actually grounded in how UK academics behave. Your answer is generic and not actually applicable to this country. That is, it would not be a reasonable expectation for anyone working in a UK university to have, and is not one anyone would bother to concern themself with catering for (unless I suppose they were directly asked to, but if someone did ask me that I'd think they were incredibly pompous, and I suspect so would the vast majority of my colleagues).
    – MJeffryes
    Commented Jul 4 at 6:36
  • 2
    @MJeffryes I am a PDRA at a well-known UK university. We have academics from all over the world from different countries and cultures, and some of them prefer more formal communication to others. You don't know, so you shouldn't assume. Even some British academics can be a bit fussy about it. My English PI, for example, we are on first name terms in private settings and in small project meetings, but in some group meetings he addresses everyone by their title (if they have one), including when introducing himself. Commented Jul 4 at 13:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .