I visited DI Gasell Next Level in Stockholm today, where we were able to take part in practical advice from successful winners and partners such as Peter Hellgren, Shervin Razani, Pernilla Ramslöv, KONRAD BERGSTRÖM, Caroline Strand interviewed by Andreas Johansson and Linnea Bolter.
Has anyone asked themselves whether DI Gasell is a Gasell company itself?
I suspect it is, without having all the figures on the table. But let's take a look at the criteria:
Net sales: I guess that DI Gasell has sales of around 25 million sek, which is above the 10 msek limit.
Employees: I think that they probably have at least 10 employees, which meets the requirement.
Growth: Doubling sales over a four-year period may be challenging for DI Gasell. Instead, we can look at other growth metrics, for instance 68% increase in interest over the past four years, shown by search data from MyTelescope, is impressive and indicates strong growth.
Overall, even though DI does not meet all the criteria to be classified as a Gasell company in the strict sense, they show clear signs of growth and success. Their concept has been established for 25 years and continues to attract great interest.
While Dagens Industri cannot formally call itself a Gasell company, they undoubtedly deserve recognition for their successful business and contribution to Swedish business.
Did Mauser mention they closed 2 plants in the United States after this aquesition causing 100 in Cincinnati to lose their jobs.