TheMadTitan
A Colloquial Formality
- Aug 22, 2004
- 93,709
- 10,943
Zombies? This is some bullshit.
The sad thing is, this is sort of a game I've always wanted, coop zombie survival. But what does it have to do with Metal Gear?
The sad thing is, this is sort of a game I've always wanted, coop zombie survival. But what does it have to do with Metal Gear?
Parasites, son!The sad thing is, this is sort of a game I've always wanted, coop zombie survival. But what does it have to do with Metal Gear?
Parasites
Just pretend it's not Metal Gear and love it because it'll have some of the best gameplay to ever exist simply due to the foundations the game is built on.The sad thing is, this is sort of a game I've always wanted, coop zombie survival. But what does it have to do with Metal Gear?
Hey, TFU kicked assWould you let the failure of Force Unleashed detract from Knights of the Old Republic ?
Shouldn't it be easier then to just title the game with a new name instead of using the "metal gear" name?I've said before that the series is effectively over in my mind. I've wanted the series to end for a while, so that it would end on a high note. MGSV, despite its flaws, accomplished that.
That's why this doesn't bother me, and I'm largely fine with it. The series is already over. Anything afterwards does not detract because I would consider it part of another timeline, whether it is really part of another timeline or not. Will I play this game? Probably not because it appears to have little to contribute to the legacy (a legacy which is already written). Like Rising, it doesn't exist in my mind other than a punchline. This is my favorite series of all time, it has been for many years. I've simply blocked out all future games if they look bad.
In the event that this game ends up having a decent story or great gameplay, I'll buy it, but it will still be separate and not the same. Think of it like different Star Wars series. Would you let the failure of Force Unleashed detract from Knights of the Old Republic ? Would we let Super Bombad Racing take away from Rogue Squadron? Just compartmentalize, people.
It's MGS5, but with zombies.Will this game have a similar game play style to past MGS games, or is this game going to be an ongoing shooter with constant fast paced action?
And from what I've read, pretty much no stealth.It's MGS5, but with zombies.Will this game have a similar game play style to past MGS games, or is this game going to be an ongoing shooter with constant fast paced action?
People only had something like half an hour to play the demo and it basically funneled them into base defense; there was no real opportunity for stealth in those hands on.And from what I've read, pretty much no stealth.It's MGS5, but with zombies.Will this game have a similar game play style to past MGS games, or is this game going to be an ongoing shooter with constant fast paced action?
Are you loko? PW is easily one of the best MGS games, I can tell you it's totally worth playing it.A MGS game with no stealth? Even 5 had way more stealth than 4.
I'm not sure I'm feeling this so far.
And a side question - I have MGS Peace Walker and Ground Zero? Are these 2 games worth playing through after 90 hours of playing 5? Will they be "bad games" due to me playing 5 or are they both great games in their own respect? And what other games in the series do PW and Ground Zero compare with?