ShutUpNavi
No Longer a Noob
Simple question. As we know most Zelda titles are only loosely connected to one another. Most games have a few references to one another, but otherwise take place hundreds/thousands of years apart. Most feature new incarnations of Link and Zelda. However there are a handful of LOZ games which take place as direct sequels set years apart at most.
*Zelda 2 was a direct sequel to Zelda 1, featuring the same Link, though not the same Princess Zelda.
*Link's Awakening starred the same Link as A Link to the Past (though some theorized it could have been retconed to Oracle's Link).
*Majora's Mask takes place almost immediately after Ocarina of Time.
*Oracle of Seasons/Ages exist as two separate parts of one story.
*Four Swords Adventures is a direct continuation of Four Swords story (though its not clear if they feature the same Link/Zelda).
*Phantom Hourglass takes place within a year or so of Wind Waker.
*Triforce Hero's feature the same Link from A Link between World's according to Nintendo (though I doubt if TFH is even canon).
There are also Zelda games that while not direct sequels in the strict sense could be considered spiritual successors. A Link between Worlds is a clear continuation to A Link to the Past both in story and tone. Spirit Tracks features characters that were alive during Phantom Hourglass. Wind Waker, though thousands of years apart from Ocarina of Time continues its story with Ganondorf. Finally Skyward Sword is a distant prequel to Ocarina of Time.
Now that we've dredged up the past we come to Breath of the Wild. Mild spoilers to those who haven't beat the game. It ends with Calamity Ganon sealed away indefinitely, the champions spirits departed, and Zelda returning to a Hyrule that's left in ruins, but now peaceful. In the secret ending Zelda says divine beast Vah Ruta has stopped working and they should visit the Zora king to inform him. That brings me to the threads main question.
Does Breath of the Wild deserve a sequel of any sort? It could take place directly after the end of the game where we find out what's happening to the divine beasts. It could be interesting to see how the world reacts to the prospect of Hyrule being rebuilt, or what will happen now that there's ancient advanced technology lying abandoned all over the place. The next Zelda could also feature a completely new story and tone, but feature the same Link and Zelda.
Majora's Mask was a direct sequel to Ocarina of Time, but the two games were nothing alike. Speaking of MM, reusing the previous games assets could help boost the next game along in development, which could be another benefit to a BOTW sequel. There's also the possibility of going backwards and having a BOTW prequel set either 100 years or 10,000 years before the game in its backstory.
I've also included an option for a spiritual successor to BOTW. This wouldn't feature the same characters, but would feature a distant continuation of the games story or tone. Think of that the same way you would ALTTP and ALBW, or OOT and TWW. Finally let me know if you think the series needs to move on and have a completely new story with little or any connection to BOTW. Prehaps the game didn't include enough meaningful content to continue on with and its time for something fresh.
*Zelda 2 was a direct sequel to Zelda 1, featuring the same Link, though not the same Princess Zelda.
*Link's Awakening starred the same Link as A Link to the Past (though some theorized it could have been retconed to Oracle's Link).
*Majora's Mask takes place almost immediately after Ocarina of Time.
*Oracle of Seasons/Ages exist as two separate parts of one story.
*Four Swords Adventures is a direct continuation of Four Swords story (though its not clear if they feature the same Link/Zelda).
*Phantom Hourglass takes place within a year or so of Wind Waker.
*Triforce Hero's feature the same Link from A Link between World's according to Nintendo (though I doubt if TFH is even canon).
There are also Zelda games that while not direct sequels in the strict sense could be considered spiritual successors. A Link between Worlds is a clear continuation to A Link to the Past both in story and tone. Spirit Tracks features characters that were alive during Phantom Hourglass. Wind Waker, though thousands of years apart from Ocarina of Time continues its story with Ganondorf. Finally Skyward Sword is a distant prequel to Ocarina of Time.
Now that we've dredged up the past we come to Breath of the Wild. Mild spoilers to those who haven't beat the game. It ends with Calamity Ganon sealed away indefinitely, the champions spirits departed, and Zelda returning to a Hyrule that's left in ruins, but now peaceful. In the secret ending Zelda says divine beast Vah Ruta has stopped working and they should visit the Zora king to inform him. That brings me to the threads main question.
Does Breath of the Wild deserve a sequel of any sort? It could take place directly after the end of the game where we find out what's happening to the divine beasts. It could be interesting to see how the world reacts to the prospect of Hyrule being rebuilt, or what will happen now that there's ancient advanced technology lying abandoned all over the place. The next Zelda could also feature a completely new story and tone, but feature the same Link and Zelda.
Majora's Mask was a direct sequel to Ocarina of Time, but the two games were nothing alike. Speaking of MM, reusing the previous games assets could help boost the next game along in development, which could be another benefit to a BOTW sequel. There's also the possibility of going backwards and having a BOTW prequel set either 100 years or 10,000 years before the game in its backstory.
I've also included an option for a spiritual successor to BOTW. This wouldn't feature the same characters, but would feature a distant continuation of the games story or tone. Think of that the same way you would ALTTP and ALBW, or OOT and TWW. Finally let me know if you think the series needs to move on and have a completely new story with little or any connection to BOTW. Prehaps the game didn't include enough meaningful content to continue on with and its time for something fresh.
Last edited: