Google apps
Main menu
1 – 1 of 1
Blogger Richard Worth said...

I am afraid I take exception to your penis: not a phrase I was expecting use any time soon, or indeed, ever. Specifically, when I was at college, some people took the kind of pulp adventure, sci-fi, Ray Harryhausen monster, FRPG genre quite seriously. It may not be great art or literature, but nor was it always pantomime. Either you accepted that the hero was in a life-and-death struggle with the monster, or you were basically wasting your time not even on consuming garbage, but on pushing garbage around your plate. 'Image of the Fendahl' appears to be on the level of a quite-good RPG scenario: the heroes have to deal with a cast of suspicious-seeming NPCs, with as much personality as the referee's acting skills run to, with weird science and dark magic, and with a monster that looks like something that crawled out from under a stone, only of nightmare size, and which you can't run away from. If one of the players had compared it to a male generative organ, then the referee might have reasonably told the player to take things a little more seriously, or perhaps to find some other way of occupying their Saturday afternoon, or just said nothing and then let the monster kill the player's character. I am afraid that with most episodes of old 'Who', I am interested in the craft of pulling together an adventure story for young people, how to improvise settings and costumes, the topical references and playing with adult genres, that pre-CGI monsters could be either silly pantomime stuff or actually quite good, and that I am in the company of people who enjoy this stuff. Compared with more modern SF&F with bigger budgets, stronger source material and a sizeable fan following, old 'Who' is not worth poking fun at, any more than it is worth referring to vintage Spiderman as 'Bug Boy' and grumbling about the limits of four-colour artwork.

Thursday, 28 October, 2021