Google apps
Main menu
1 – 7 of 7
Blogger Mike Taylor said...

"Loving your neighbor as yourself was said by Jesus to be the whole heart of the Torah."

Actually, he said it was the second part of the Law. See Matthew 22:36-40, Mark 12:29-31 and (for a slightly different account) Luke 10:25-28.

-- Your friendly neighbourhood Bible pedant.

Thursday, 18 August, 2016

Blogger Andrew Rilstone said...

Your No Prize is in the post.

Thursday, 18 August, 2016

Blogger Mike Taylor said...

While a No Prize is always welcome, I feel that sea monkeys, X-ray specs, Hostess Twinkies or a body-building course would be more appropriate.

Thursday, 18 August, 2016

Blogger Andrew Rilstone said...

I had Sea Monkeys when I was a kid. They are actually quite fun, once you get the hang of the back that they basically little insects and not little naked underwater people at all. You'd actually have to work quite hard to keep them healthy, making it good practice for serious aquarium keeping.

I had X-Ray Specs (from the joke shop on Blackpool Pier). I was too young to particularly care about naked ladies one way or the other, but the illusion of seeing the lead in a pencil is quite convincing.

Hostess Twinkies I had in a service station in Somewhereville, when Scientist Buddy was driving me to the Grand Canyon. I can see why they had to advertise them so aggressively.

I believe the Charles Atlas course is still available, and actually works. I was more interested in the hypnotism disc, which I suspect didn't.

Thursday, 18 August, 2016

Blogger Mike Taylor said...

I always assumed "sea monkeys" were something like Triops. Our boys had a few of these when they were younger.

But to me, the idea of sea monkeys, X-ray specs, Hostess Twinkies or Charles Atlas body-building courses actually existing feels very beside the point. They were all part of the exoticism of the Marvel milieu, just as must as Stan and Steve and the Bullpen and indeed Spider-Man. (If one of your subsequent posts on Spider-Man majors on these adverts, I for one will not be disappointed.)

Thursday, 18 August, 2016

Blogger Keith Edwin Schooley said...

I always liked the "friendly neighborhood Spider-Man" joke. To me, Spider-Man is an inversion of the deadly serious superhero formula--almost a mock-heroic figure--and the joke is a self-deprecating part of that. No one would ever imagine a friendly neighborhood Batman or Superman or Captain America. Spider-Man gave us permission to laugh at--but also to laugh with--our superheroes. We don't have to regard Spider-Man with humorless awe and wonder, because Peter Parker doesn't.

Thursday, 22 September, 2016

Blogger Andrew Rilstone said...

Yes, I think that's probably right. (And the mock heroism is the flip side of the angst and tragedy of the sub-plots)

Thursday, 22 September, 2016