Politicians often are firmly committed to what they say they will do – until they announce otherwise.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
US election 2024 – Analysis and Comment
Under normal circumstances, Trump’s criminal record and other aspects of his life, including financial history, would disqualify him from getting access to classified information.
Keir Starmer is ideologically more aligned with the Democrats. But history shows that isn’t the only key to good US-UK political relations.
The Supreme Court’s decision has major implications for the criminal prosecution of Trump and for the country and how it is governed.
Renaissance philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli dissected the threats authoritarian figures pose to representative government.
UK political leaders have just a few short weeks − and limited campaign funds − to woo voters.
Comparing states’ populations on a range of demographic and socioeconomic data reveals similarities and differences across the nation.
A scholar of history of education and American politics explains what is behind his course on conspiracy theories and how students learn to debunk fake ideas.
A presidential candidate’s ‘home state advantage’ should help them win a primary, which then bodes well for how they do in successive contests. But if they lose their home state, they’re in trouble.
During a campaign speech in South Carolina, President Biden made it clear that he is not only running against Donald Trump but also against white supremacy.
Lawyers submitting briefs to the Supreme Court in the Trump Colorado ballot case must file a ‘certificate of word count.’ Why? As one judge put it, lawyers’ briefs are ‘too long, too long, too long.’
From the ‘static’ polls to Trump’s ‘dissing’ of voters, two political scientists look at the Iowa caucus and see more than just the fact that Trump won it, resoundingly.
The unusual candidacy of former President Donald Trump has made election polling especially appealing, more than a year from the election. But consumers beware: Those polls may be wrong.
ChatGPT and its ilk give propagandists and intelligence agents a powerful new tool for interfering in politics. The clock is ticking on learning to spot this disinformation before the 2024 election.
New findings by political scientists at Northwestern University and Harvard Kennedy School provide a clearer picture of which demographic groups support Trump.
While derision and mockery permeate airwaves and social media feeds, satire holds the key to creating a more informed, engaged electorate.